14/07/02 23:37:58.56
>>248
だからもう一辺読んでこい、
っていっても読まねーだろーからここに書いてやる
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.nature.com)
> (1) Figure 1a and b in the Letter both show embryos generated from STAP cells, not a comparison
> of ES- and STAP-derived chimaeric embryos, as indicated in the legend.
>
> (2) Extended Data Fig. 7d in the Article and Extended Data Fig. 1a in the Letter are different
> images of the same embryo and not, as indicated in the legends, a diploid chimaera embryo and tetraploid chimaera embryo.
>
> (3) There is an erroneous description in Fig. 1a in the Letter. The right panel of Fig. 1a is
> not a ‘long exposure’ image at the camera level but a digitally enhanced one.
>
> (4) In Fig. 4b of the Letter, STAP cell and ES cell are wrongly labelled in a reverse manner.
>
> (5) <若山解析の結果のごく一部の概略>
(1)～(5)の全てが「STAP細胞」の実在を疑わせる内容になっているにもかかわらず、
結論は「STAP幹細胞の実在は疑わしい」。どう考えてもおかしい。