11/05/10 10:04:21.68
>>318
According to what you are describing, you had already recognized that my
understanding on the mass gap problem is very likely to be incorrect or
wrong. Since this problem is very much considered to be based on some ideas
of theoretical and/or mathematical physics, you are very much expected to
present the right ideas in such a way that my posting >>47 should be replaced
by yours.
I wait for the very proper posting(s) of yours to have the better understanding
of the MASS GAP PROBLEM.
--neko--