09/05/13 12:37:21 +3UlQA7X
>>277
Do the problem to be say the candid shot?
However, she insisted that this was a kiddie porn.
And, the request of the access inhibit has been made.
This causes all confusion.
ｽﾚﾘﾝｸ(erobbs板:603番)
First of all, it is necessary to define what the kiddie porn.
Every range of the kiddie porn on which she insists will be very too large, and be treated as a child pornography contributor.
She assumed seeing like the kiddie porn, and deleted even general pornography.
And, the request of the access inhibit has been made as a child pornography contributor.
She is insisting that this obtains the acknowledgment of Mr. JIM.
Is this true?
She is requesting the access inhibit by a very vague, and sense standard.
Does Mr. JIM understand the situation?