09/05/13 10:20:12 iliVsbTv
>>268
I'm not >>267, I think it would be nice to
clarify the situation.
A deleter deletes child porn photo direct link as
requested in the child porn deletion request thread.
Some users blame her for deleting ordinary photos
instead of child porn.
The deleter wondered if she can take a look at the linked
picture for checking purpose and what exactly are considered
as child porn photos. She talked with local police and
they said she can look at them for deletion checking purpose.
Then she went over to the police with deleted linked pictures
to get some advise - what kind of photos are considered to be child
porn.
She said that she now know what kind of photo link she should
delete, but she has no intention to disclose the exact parameter.
(Because if she does so, some user may try to post borderline
pictures or think of get around way)
Some user concern about their host address regulation by Fox-san
for posting innocent(their belief) picture, since the deleter now
asks Fox-san for regulating the repeated offender.