20/07/26 14:00:44.36 9ZaudBKU.net
>>240
>What we have then is this: For each fixed opponent strategy, if i is chosen uniformly independently of that strategy (where the "independently" here isn't in the probabilistic sense), we win with probability at least (n－1)/n. That's right. – Alexander Pruss Dec 19 '13 at 15:05
はい、Pruss も箱入り無数目成立を認めてますよー
>But now the question is whether we can translate this to a statement without the conditional "For each fixed opponent strategy".
この question は箱入り無数目とは無関係ですねー
>But the opponent can win by foreseeing what which value of i we're going to choose and which choice of representatives we'll make.
Pruss さん正気ですか？予想できたらランダムとは言わないんですよー 負け惜しみはみっともないですねー
Purss は負け惜しみでいろんなこと言ってるが、少なくとも箱入り無数目成立は認めてますねー
未だに認められないのは瀬田だけですねー