11/03/13 04:01:11.33 OgJ3rpzW0
468 ：名無しさん＠涙目です。(関西地方) [] ：2011/03/13(日) 03:56:16.82 ID:E/v5HAU90 [PC]
>>447
チェルノブイリ、スリーマイルに次ぐワースト３位だってさ。
Malcolm Grimston, associate fellow for energy, environment and development at London's Chatham House,
said the explosion indicated that "it's clearly a serious situation,
but that in itself does not necessarily mean major (nuclear) contamination."
"This is a situation that has the potential for a nuclear catastrophe.
It's basically a race against time, because what has happened is
that plant operators have not been able to cool down the core of at least two reactors," said Robert Alvarez, a senior scholar at the Institute for Policy Studies in Washington.
The situation ranks as the third-most-serious nuclear accident on record,
Cirincione said. He said only the 1979 partial meltdown of a reactor core at the Three Mile Island nuclear plant in Pennsylvania and the 1986 Chernobyl disaster in the Soviet Union were worse.