18/01/27 04:44:28.08 t+9k0Ljj.net
保守主義の父とされるバークは共産党、西部スクールの共産シンパの国家社会主義者の言うところの新自由主義者のような主張をしている
Adam Smith and Edmund Burke
ir.uiowa.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1082&context=poroi
Although the Scots philosopher Adam Smith's Wealth of Nations (1776) found few insightful readers in
England before the l790s, Smith himself noted that among what early readers he had the Anglo-Irish
Whig Member of Parliament Edmund. Burke stood out (Tribe 1984; Teichgraber, 1985). Smith informed
a confidant that Burke “is the only man I ever knew who, without communication, thought on economic
subjects exactly as I”
They became correspondents and friends. But
while Smith made it clear that government support should be extended in
hard times to unemployed workers, who have a right to expect it, Burke
flatly denied it. “Labor,” he wrote in l795, “is a commodity and as such an
article of trade” (Burke, 1795, in Kramnick, 1999, 200). Trade, Burke
declared, is none of government’s business under any circumstances. “Of all
things,” he wrote, “an indiscreet tampering with the trade of provisions is the
most dangerous and … always worst … in the time of scarcity” (Burke,
1795, in Kramnick, 1999, 195).