21/05/06 23:09:05.29 UAzvQ7Lj.net
- there is no explanation how CentOS Stream is a technically acceptable replacement
for CentOS Linux. There is many questions here, none answered.
全くその通りで、これまでRHELのクローン（安定版）で普通に業務にも使えていたCentOSが
開発用不安定版のバクだらけの、CentOS Streamに置き換えらられるはずがない！ 下にも同様のレポ。
Date: Tue, 4 May 2021 10:57:11 +0000
URLﾘﾝｸ(listserv.fnal.gov)
When the Centos 8 news came out, I tried out Centos Stream against our configuration. Kickstart and Puppet config
needed very little change and I was able to bring up a VM in our lab config quite easily.
I have two observations:
1) Updates are sparse, none for ages then a large batch of version updates.
2) Stuff can be broken and remain so for a long while. We use Podman rootless. That was broken in the version of Stream
I initially installed and remained broken for a few weeks until the next chunk of updates. I looked up the issue in the RHEL
tracker and it had been fixed quickly in Fedora etc. but this did not make it to Stream on the same timescale.
My view is that Stream is exactly what RHEL say it is, a development distribution to which 3rd parties can contribute to
RHEL development and from which 3rd parties can base their own distributions. It's not for end users, or small
organisations that need timely security updates and other fixes and can't produce same themselves.