10/09/21 15:30:29 2Jrc4WGM0
一応、>>693訳してみた。
08/Jan/1953 People's Daily (Chinese Central Committee's official publication) posted the article
titled "Ryukyu people's struggle against the American occupation", which explains the Diaoyu Islands as "Senkaku Islands" and a part of Okinawa.
Nov/1958
the publishing company in Beijing published "World map collection", which depicted the island as "Senkaku Islands owned by Japan".
Oct/1965
Ministry of National Defense (Republic of China) published the first edition of "World map 1st collection - East Asia",
which depicted the island as "Senkaku Islands owned by Japan".
Jan/1970
the first edition of Taiwanese government-designated textbook for secondary school's geography was published ,
and it explained the Diaoyu island as "Senkaku Islands owned by Japan".
1969-1970
the UN reported the reserve assessment of oil near to the Diaoyu Islands,
which is about 109.5 billion barrels (about the same amount of the oil in Iraq and more than Kuwait and UAE).
30/Dec/1971
Chinese government (Chinese Foreign Minister) officially staked a claim to the Diaoyu island in the first time.
According to China (and Taiwan)'s official perspective to this island,
it is pretty much obvious why China's started to claim that the Diaoyu Islands is owned by China.
Before the UN's report, China was not interested in those valueless small islands at all.
ただ主張としては弱いなあ。どれも中国政府の公式の場での見解じゃないし。
実際どれも全部、国際法廷の場で中国が日本の領有権を認めていた証拠としては採用できないでしょ。