10/08/07 23:59:14 /CjLZPad
wikipediaによると日本が古代朝鮮の植民地だったことになっているが。。。
URLﾘﾝｸ(en.wikipedia.org)
The legend of Empress Jingu's conquest of southern Korea (otherwise from being irrelevant to the sinmyo passage :
Empress Jingu is said to have reigned in the 3rd century, while the Sinmyo passage falls along the lines of the 5th century)
was considered as mythological by the Japanese, but can be linked to the Samguk Sagi (Chronicles of the Three Kingdoms),
with King Asin of Baekje sent his son Jeonji in 397[21] and King Silseong of Silla sent his son Misaheun in 402.[22]
This all adds to the debate on whether the Japanese Imperial family is Korean and which ethnicity Empress Jingu really was.[23][24]
The three Korean kingdoms boasted centralized administration (influenced by China), but it is also argued
that war was made by warriors and not by bureaucrats. In addition, the more advanced weapons technology
in Korea at that time also adds to views that the Wa state, which was not yet a consolidated state at the
time nor possessed iron weaponry and horses, was in fact incapable of the military exploits recorded in
the Nihon Shoki and the Kojiki. Most scholars today agree that Yamato couldn't send a military expedition
by the time of the stele's inscription; on the other hand, Japanese generals of Yamato conquered (from
3rd century to the 6th century) territories from Southern Kyūshū to current Aizu in Tohoku. So the
question is again discussed, were the Yamato a colony from Korea that conquered Kyushu?[23]
An important comparison is that ancient Chinese chronicles confirm the Japanese presence in the continent :
The Chinese Book of Sui says that "Silla and Baekje both take Wa to be a big country of treasure source,
with many rare and precious things in Japan; also [Silla and Baekje] highly esteemed it [many rare and precious things],
and regularly send their person there." [25] Some scholars claim that the Wa is considered to be a colony from Korea
in ancient times,[23][26] so how the Book of Sui should be interpreted is still debated, especially given its potential
for political bias (the Book of Sui was compiled not by Sui court historians but by those of the successor kingdom of
T'ang, who were bitter enemies of both Baekje and Goguryeo, and later Silla for a brief time, and thus had plenty
of reason to slander them in court records).[citation needed]