11/05/19 20:06:19.33 Lf56vGp50
>>839
どうぞー
まったくの無関係者だしｗ
単にここの浄水器がコストも検査も公的機関認証もありだから
皆で検討しようってだけの気持ちも汲み取れないどころか
人を情弱と見下しながらＷＨＯの文字も読めないたかーい教養をお持ちのようですからｗ
Radioactivity Concerns in Drinking Water
Multi-Pure Addresses Radioactivity Concerns in Drinking Water as a Result of Damage to the Fukushima Dai-ichi Nuclear Power Plant in Japan.
Dr. Fenwick has also released this statement:
"Radioactivity (its sources, the decay process, transmission, protection, and disposal) is an unquestionably complex topic.
The information provided here is admittedly, and necessarily, very general. The largest concern in drinking water
after a meltdown is likely the presence of Uranium, although there are many additional sources (Plutonium, Radium,
Cesium, etc.). We do not specifically test for the reduction of these materials, nor are there NSF standards/ protocols.
With that said, heavier radionuclides, like those listed above, are likely reduced with our blocks, specifically those blocks
that are certified for lead reduction.
"Three important notes: 1. As always, efficacy and lifetime will depend on several factors (compounds’ unique properties,
concentration in the influent water, water chemistry, etc.). 2. In addition to those listed above, several other “daughter”
nuclides/ radionuclides (products of the decay process) of various chemistries/ classes will have various reduction
efficacies. Commenting on these is not possible. 3. Unlike other non-radioactive contaminants (Lead, Mercury, Arsenic,
VOCs, other organics), removal from the water, and thus concentration in the block, may not be sufficient for the radioactive
elements/ compounds. They continue to emit radiation even when removed/ immobilized. Based on these issues,
and the EPA testing and “endorsement,” reverse osmosis is a more bona fide technology in this case.”