科学者「西村主審は物理学的に誤審」←これでもう結論かat POVERTY
科学者「西村主審は物理学的に誤審」←これでもう結論か - 暇つぶし2ch1:番組の途中ですがアフィサイトへの転載は禁止です
14/06/14 09:20:53.72 gyTFIVUt0 BE:183724976-PLT(12001) ポイント特典
sssp://img.2ch.net/ico/mac.gif
Stony Brook University physicist Chang Kee Jung analyzed the play frame by frame and estimated it would take 600 Newtons of force for Lovren to stop Fred's FRED forward motion.
ある学者の分析では600ニュートンの力がフレッジにかかったと推測される
The force required to cause him to fall backward, Jung said, would have been "much larger" than that.
フレッジが倒れるにはもっと大きな力が必要だ
So was Fred's fall legitimate? "Highly unlikely," says Jung.

Lynchburg College physicist Eric Goff also studied video of the 0.4 seconds in question.
After scrutinizing his "linear and angular momenta," Goff concluded that Fred's fall only could have happened if Fred had made a conscious decision to hit the dirt.
別の学者が線運動量・角運動量を調べたが故意でないと起こらない。
There's a highly scientific term for that: Fred took a dive.

URLリンク(online.wsj.com)


レスを読む
最新レス表示
レスジャンプ
類似スレ一覧
スレッドの検索
話題のニュース
おまかせリスト
オプション
しおりを挟む
スレッドに書込
スレッドの一覧
暇つぶし2ch