18/10/07 20:52:34.79 DBQuDzimd.net
>>48
リスニングは準1と1級のスピードは
ほぼ同等なんですかね？？
51:
18/10/08 00:59:33.97 fcGeOFtja.net
>>49
1級の方が若干速いかなと思います。
52:
18/10/08 01:35:49.89 fcGeOFtja.net
今回の1級の英作文はこんな感じで書いてきました。
30点取れれば良いけど、いくつか表現上のミスが発覚したので、よくて25～28点ぐらいかなという気がします。
お題：Has a university degree in the humanities lost its relevance in today's world?
《私の書いた答案(再現)》
第1段落
There are so many people who say that a university degree in the humanities has its lost its relevance in today's society, but I disagree with this idea.
There are three reasons to support my gdea.
第2段落
The first reason is that academic fields of humanities are the basis of our ways of thinking, even if we have already graduated from universities.
For example, studying philosophy often improves our skills of critical thinking, and comparing our culture with different cultures can make our views wide.
These facts must be the evidence that academic fields of humanities are useful for us, even in today's society.
第3段落
The second reason is that academic fields of humanities are also the basis of other sciences.
For instance, history is the important aspect of examining economics, political science, and so on.
In addition, humanities often affect the way of comprehending sciences, such as physics and mathematics.
We can say that there are no sciences which are not related to humanities.
第4段落
The third reason is that, by studying humanities, we can become cultural people(←爆笑ｗｗ).
We can easily be hired from corporations if we are cultural people.
That's because corporations want to hire those people, and cultural people often give their corporations the new way of thinking. This will contribute to their company's success.
第5段落
For these reasons, I believe that studying humanities must be important even in today's world.
53:
18/10/08 01:44:29.17 fcGeOFtja.net
>>51で入力ミス。
× a university degree in the humanities has its lost its relevance
→◯a university degree in the humanities has lost its relevance
×gdea
→◯idea
で、今のところ発覚している間違いは、
・basisやbases(複数形)にするべきだった
・make our views wideという表現は一般的には使われてないので減点可能性アリ
・cultural people(爆笑)は、教養人という意味で書いたものの、実はcultural peopleに教養人という意味は存在しない。(教養人は"a person of cuture"らしい。)
という感じです。
54:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
18/10/08 01:47:36.05 TvuSTyxq0.net
>>51
Very good Job!
55:
18/10/08 01:48:15.18 fcGeOFtja.net
今回はhumanitiesの使い方が本当に難しくて、
この単語は「主語として使う場合にtheが必要なのかどうか」「そもそも可算名詞なのか不可算名詞なのか」など非常に迷いました。
それも含めて、1級の英作文としては少し難しいなと思いました。
私の>>51の答案だとどうでしょう。
既に単語のミスが発覚してるから満点ではないと思うが・・・
56:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
18/10/08 09:05:55.44 997A3ebBa.net
確かに書きにくいテーマではあったなあ
57:
18/10/08 13:36:53.25 4Ueh5x4fa.net
>>53
ありがとうございます！
>>55
今回はhumanitiesやlose its relevanceの解釈の時点で間違えた人が多いみたいです。
あと1級スレを見てると、地味にin today's worldという条件を全然踏まえないで書いてる人も多いみたいなので、
以上を総合すると、今回は素点平均が大幅に下がり、前回よりもCSEスコアがインフレ傾向になるかもしれないですね
テーマ自体はごくごく普通だったと思います
58:
18/10/08 13:41:37.67 4Ueh5x4fa.net
しかし、教養人という単語をcultured peopleではなくcultural peopleと間違えて英訳してしまったのは痛恨の極みです
cultural peopleをグーグルで画像検索して、“インディアン”の画像ばっかり出てきた時は、目の前が真っ暗になりました
1点減点ぐらいで許してもらえないかなぁ
59:
18/10/08 14:09:17.04 4Ueh5x4fa.net
特定を避けるために少しぼかしますが、
Rがおよそ4.5割
Lがおよそ8割
でした。
CSEスコアでいうと、
Rが570ぐらい、Lが700～710ぐらいかな
とすると、Wで750～760取れれば合格です。
素点でいえば28点ぐらいは欲しいところ
>>51の英作文で果たして28点も貰えるだろうか…
60:
18/10/08 14:49:21.15 4Ueh5x4fa.net
あ、表の見方間違えてた
R630ぐらい、L700～710ぐらいですね
これだとWは700ぐらいでおkだから素点は26点程度取れてれば当確です
さすがにWは26点は超えてると信じたい
61:性
18/10/08 15:02:46.33 S0lZ51rq0.net
>>51
性は、自慢じゃないが、出題文の意味がイマイチわかりませんよ。
出題文が悪いなぁ。これだと、出題文の意味をお仲間から耳打ち
されている人達が大いに有利になる。
62:
18/10/13 21:00:20.07 t4Etr6Spa.net
英検1級とは少し関係なくなってしまうけど、
準1スレの岩石ジュースさんにはぜひ今度こそ2次試験で合格してほしいなと思います
私が準1スレの住人だった頃から、陰ながら応援しておりました
63:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
18/10/14 14:31:17.44 khsFJFbn0.net
>>57
知らんけど教養ってsophisticated系の意味なんじゃないの？
文化的、カルチャーってのは日本語の意味と違ってて
大衆的で低俗なものを表す気がするんだが
64:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
18/10/14 14:38:23.87 khsFJFbn0.net
>>49
1級はリスニングのスピードというより
設問読む時間に対する解答時間が短いんじゃないかな？
だからリスニング得意な人でも満点は難しい
65:
18/10/15 22:40:34.80 fI2IPskTp.net
>>62
sophisticatedは、どっちかというと「上品な」とか「センスが良くて洗練された」みたいなニュアンスだと思ってました
>>63
解答時間の短さはそれほど試験会場では気にならなかったです
1級と言えども一つ一つの選択肢はかなり短いし
というより、1級のリスニング自体、想像してたよりはずっと簡単でした
ほとんど準1のリスニングと難易度が変わらなかったような
66:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
18/10/22 14:09:38.08 7kYBrfzXd.net
>>64
結局、受かったの？？
67:
18/10/22 14:37:15.06 W88qR+SEa.net
おかげさまで英検1級の1次には合格できました。
R：19/41(cse:636)
L：22/27(cse:694)
W：26/32(cse:747)
です。
英作文は26～30点ぐらいだろうなと予想してたら、一番低い26点でした。
まあでも、>>51みたいに平易な文法と単語(ほとんど中学生レベル？)の英作文で26点貰えたのはむしろありがたいと思うべきなのかな。
それでもスレタイの英作文30点が達成できなかったのは物凄く悔しいです。
今回の英検で万が一合格できても、また修行のために1次から受け直すかもしれません。
68:
18/10/26 19:07:05.34 G4NHdFgGp.net
英検1級Writingの点数の細かい内訳が自宅に送られてきました。
URLﾘﾝｸ(iup.2ch-library.com)
W：26/32
・内容7/8
・構成6/8
・語彙6/8
・文法7/8
内容が7点なのはまあ、>>51の第4パラグラフが変な内容なので、そこで1点減点されたんだと思います。
構成が6点なのは意外でした。テンプレ的なパラグラフ構成だと個性がないとみなされて減点されてしまうのだろうか。
語彙が6点なのはcultured peopleをcultural peopleと間違えたり、make our views wideみたいな不自然なフレーズを使ったことで2点減点されたのでしょう。
文法が7点なのは、多分、単数と複数のミスあたりで1点減点されてるからだと思います。
一応、1級英作文の採点としては甘くもなく厳しくもなくといった印象で、少なくとも準1の英作文みたいな激甘採点では無さそうです。
採点結果については概ね納得がいく内容となりました。
69:
18/10/26 19:10:07.91 G4NHdFgGp.net
1級の2次の会場は、麹町学園女子高校でした。11月11日です。
上履きが必要な上に、よりによってAM9:15スタートなのが面倒くさいですが、
同じ会場の人はどうぞよろしくお願いしますね。
70:
18/11/11 10:46:43.09 WkZh8hfrp.net
爆死
とりあえず2月末までこのスレを放置します
71:名無しさん＠英語勉強中 (ﾜｯﾁｮｲ dfbb-AFO5)
20/01/09 22:41:43 MvCv2t7p0.net
泉悌二は地獄へ落ちたようだな
72:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/09/21 20:13:52.03 /f65zue7d.net
この人、たまに1級の本スレに出現してないですよね？
なんで、書き込まなくなったのだろう、、、
73:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/10/12 19:24:05.87 DlQAcxCTd.net
せっかくなので、埋めを重ねて自前のエッセイを100本上げます。(モチベが続けば)これで30点以上になると思う。
皆さんも良ければやりましょう！
74:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/10/27 19:32:11.46 JlkrNN7bd.net
Is overpopulation a threat? (1/100)
Thanks to the technologies, the world has witnessed an unprecedented growth of population. However, overpopulation presents serious problems for humans in various ranges of geographical scale.
I have three reasons to support my views.
First, our luxurious standard of living is well beyond the sustainable level. Wealthy nations alone currently consume resources faster than the speed the Earth can regenerate and other countries are likely to follow this trend. At the global scale, resource depletion literally poses a great threat to every living thing including us.
Second, locally overpopulated areas are also subject to objectionable issues. British was used to be the epitome of import-dependance in which most of foods and oil came from overseas. It resulted in massive expenditures on sea lane defense during WWll. Also, air pollution exposure in a heavily densed area could cause severe respiratory problems.
Third, overpopulation also leads to many types of environmental degradation, some of which are typically irreversible in a long run. Climate change and global warming are very controversial topics among specialists, most of whom agree that they are indeed transforming the earth into an inhaitable one.
In light of the points made above, overpopulation is a threat. More should be done to tackle with the issues it carries and we can virtually solve them by investing money to new technologies.
75:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/10/27 21:27:43.61 JlkrNN7bd.net
Infectious diseases will become a bigger problem in the coming decades? (2/100)
Infectious diseases are natural killing machines with no sense of remorse. They replicate themselves exponentially entailing a constant mutation until there's no more hosts. In this respect, they will become a bigger problem in the coming decades.
There are three reasons to support this idea.
First, our modern world has become ever smaller due to the globalization, making every part of the globe easier to access.
In addition, our highly efficient tools such as machines have driven humans to thrive, resulting in overpopulation. This in turn has put us in a vulnerable situation where our societies themselves are transforming into a hotbed for infectious diseases.
Second, several evidence suggest that most diseases used to be or are indigenous to dense forest areas in which human contacts with those viruses were rare. However, recent deforestation and exploitation of domestic animals have led to our more frequent exposure to those viruses. Wild animals that used to be their hosts are now replaced with us.
Third, antibiotics and medicine always have a role to play good for humans but the reality is not necessarily so, especially in a long run.
Infectious diseases are often subject to mutations meaning they can be born into a totally different kind, or they can aquire resistance to most drugs. Influenza and superbugs are good examples. Our medication is still far from ideal one.
All in all, our inventions and t
76:echnologies have helped us establish the globalized and populated societies. But their structures have ironically put us in a dire situation where we could potentially someday, run into an existential risk in a form of brutal pandemic. So I believe Infectious diseases will become a bigger problem in the coming decades.
77:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/10/27 21:33:27.18 JlkrNN7bd.net
Is space exploration worth the cost? (3/100)
This essay discusses that space exploration is not worth the cost.
There are so much risk as opposed to potential profits both cost-wise and environment-wise.
There are three reasons to support this idea.
First, although space exploration has established some fundations of our infrastructure such as GPS, the benefits overall would be impractically impropotionate to the costs.
The Apollo program exemplifies this.
Because the payload of current spacecrafts is very limited, we have already done what we can do within reasonable budget.
Second, even if we managed to figure out how to exploit the resources on other planets, it could undermine the nature that has long been preserved there.
Additonally, There's no scientific proofs that the change in mass of any planets in our solar system will not affect their trajectories, which could be done by importing resources to one planet from the other.
Third, the outer space environment is harsher than we think. The biggest challenge we face is radiation, which our sun constantly emits.
No human experiments for long-term space radiation exposure has yet to be yested on humans.
In conclusion, space exploration is not worth the cost. Instead, we should focus on what we can get from Earth once again. We still have a wide range of unknown deep sea areas where we might someday find something promising.
78:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/10/31 11:33:40.74 1/jwCoJVdHLWN.net
Speech: Pros and cons of zoos and aquariums(4/100)
When people ask me questions, especially of my opinion, I have always tried my best to answer with a clear yes or no.
But some of them can be ambitious because some things have evenly balanced good points and bad points, so I could not give a clear-cut answer.
So the question, "What are the pros and cons of zoos and aquariums" is the one sitting on this spectrum.
The reasons are as follows:
Pros: Animals in zoos and aquariums can attract many people young and old alike, which will then affect the local economy in a positive way.
Also, they provide the wide range of masses with general education from ecological values in nature to ethical issues centered around them.
Cons: Animals in public facilities will be caged for life, forced to live under great stress and even worse, some of them are poorly treated because of the lack of knowledge or experience of the zoo keeper in charge. It's a legally approved way of torturing animals in such a way that we do for animal testing.
To sum this up, my answer is yes and no.
Animals should be kept in a cage only temporarily on account of saving or breeding them.
And preferably released to where they came from like how Korea does for military recruitment.
Particularly, dying animals or endangered species should be so.
That way, we can spare some of them to use for animal testing. So to speak, it's a win-win situation.
79:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
20/10/31 11:35:12.65 1/jwCoJVdHLWN.net
Speech: Pros and cons of self-employment(5/100)
Alright then, let me define the term self-employment as an intro and then I
80:'ll give my opinion followed by reasons supporting it. Self-employment is a state of earning income directly from one's business. This means that one has no employer to assign him to a certain position in which he will be paid salary or wage in return for his work. He has to take risks for investments required to start up a brand-new business but he can work whenever he is pleased, or do whatever he thinks is necessary. I think it's a great thing to do particularly during times loke this with the ongoing pandemic. That being said, I definitely feel that younger generations should try this out because of the benefits that it brings, especially in terms of taking risks and learning from new experience. First, people who are self-employed are entrepreneurs. They run their own businesses. They have to take risks in order to make a profit. Now in order to make a correct investment decision, you need to carefully and thoroughly craft a business plan. It's surely challenging because you are required to come up with ideas no one had ever came up with. But if you succeed, it's very likely that you will be better off. Second, Youngsters might face failures including owning a huge debt or facing problems such as their business going bankrupt. Even if their businesses turned out to be a disastrous one, they can still easily get help from other people, especially from their families and friends. All the devotion they made for their dream were after all not just a waste of time and money because they learned a whole lot of new experiences from these processes that are otherwise inaccessible if they didn't tried. They can challenge again or get employed better equipped with new experiences and skill sets.
81:名無しさん＠英語勉強中
23/06/08 01:49:25.50 KY6iRGfSk
四六時中気候変動問題についての報道やってるが、その直後にひとり距離あたり温室効果カ゛ス排出量鉄道のЗ０倍以上ものクソ航空機た゛の
空港だのカンコ－だの推進するプロパガンダを平然と続けるマスゴミって頭に大量の蟲か゛湧いてるとしか言いようがないよな．世界最悪の殺人
組織公明党国土破壞省の強盜殺人の首魁斉藤鉄夫なんて．いまた゛に地球破壊支援た゛なんた゛と税金て゛テ□資金まで供給して都心まて゛数珠つなぎで
大量破壞兵器て゛あるクソ航空機を飛は゛しまくって毎曰莫大な温室効果ガス無駄にまき散らして気侯変動させて日本と゛ころか世界中で土砂崩れに
洪水．暴風、猛暑．大雪、森林火災にと災害連発させて．これ程の破壞活動してるテ口国家なんて日本くらいなものだろうに，それでいて
白々しく囗シアカ゛ーた゛の戯言ほさ゛いてみたり、結局、自民公明ってのは何もかも１〇〇％てめえらの私利私欲が目的た゛し．クソ航空機に無駄に
石油燃やさせてエネ価格暴騰させて．日銀に金刷らせて物価高騰させて、隣国挑發して軍拡して使途不明金作って，すでに世界トップレベルの
実効税率の中さらに異次元増税利権倍増，パリみたく暴動すら起こさない北朝鮮人民の遺伝子を濃縮したような反民主主義シ゛ャップ胸糞惡いな
創価学會員は，何百萬人も殺傷して損害を与えて私腹を肥やし続けて逮捕者まで出てる世界最悪の殺人腐敗組織公明党を
池田センセ―が囗をきけて容認するとか本気て゛思ってるとしたら侮辱にもほと゛か゛あるそ゛！
URLﾘﾝｸ(i.imgur.com)
82:過去ログ ★
[過去ログ]
■ このスレッドは過去ログ倉庫に格納されています