12/02/08 06:48:04.00 WZAcZkAv
Can you bring forth a counterargument?
Though the Japanese opposes morally,
Herbert's student does not charge the roommate who cheated.
The irrational problem can be included by observation and the result.
The Everett many-worlds interpretation, formulated in 1956,
holds that all the possibilities described by quantum theory
simultaneously occur in a multiverse composed of mostly independent parallel universes.
While the multiverse is deterministic, we perceive non-deterministic behavior governed by probabilities,
because we can observe only the universe, i.e.
Everett's interpretation is perfectly consistent with John Bell's experiments and makes them
intuitively understandable. However, according to the theory of quantum decoherence,
the parallel universes will never be accessible to us.
This inaccessibility can be understood as follows: Once a measurement is done,
the measured system becomes entangled with both the physicist who measured it and
a huge number of other particles, some of which are photons flying away towards the
other end of the universe; in order to prove that the wave function did not collapse
one would have to bring all these particles back and measure them again,
together with the system that was measured originally.
This is completely impractical, but even if one could theoretically do this,
it would destroy any evidence that the original measurement took place
(including the Scholar's memory)