【政治経済】平成床屋談義　町の噂その632

【政治経済】平成床屋談義　町の噂その632 at ASIA

【政治経済】平成床屋談義　町の噂その632 - 暇つぶし2ch31:あって、このために結果として自由に批判できる対象は白人男性だけになった Well, that's fair. The worst aspect of Obama's presidency has been the willingness of some defenders to characterize any and all criticisms of his policy or style as racist. With Warren (despite her denials) revving up for a potential 2016 presidential campaign ? and already with Hillary Clinton's effort ? we're seeing a new line of argument: That any criticism of a female politician is sexist. Apparently, the only kind of politician you can criticize on the merits in America nowadays is a white male. ＊こうした極端なアイデンティ・ポリティクスは左翼陣営の政策議論の能力を制約するもので The Democrats' tendency to argue identity politics over policy is more awkward when it's aimed at other Democrats. As The Washington Post's Jennifer Rubin comments: "Is the 'war on women' being waged by the White House, or have Democrats become so accustomed to demonizing their opponents that they can't engage in civil debates even among themselves? It does not speak well of the Democrats' ability to persuade and lead. But it does portend a non-stop stream of gender bias claims in the 2016 presidential election." ＊然しそういうふうに、議論の相手を差別主義者とか大金持ちとか決めつけるというのは危険である。英國の労働党はかって、そういうことをやりすぎて、特定有権者層に依存しすぎて、他の有権者層の信頼を失ったのだ But in arguing that everyone who disagrees with them is a racist, or a sexist, or a tool of Big Money, or whatever, the Democrats run the risk of self-destruction. This is basically what happened to the the Labour Party in Britain: A reliance on easy tropes that please the base but alienate other voters.

次ページ

続きを表示

1を表示