【米大統領選】米17州、大統領選巡るテキサスの提訴に追随★5 [あずささん★]at NEWSPLUS【米大統領選】米17州、大統領選巡るテキサスの提訴に追随★5 [あずささん★] - 暇つぶし2ch■コピペモード□スレを通常表示□オプションモード□このｽﾚｯﾄﾞのURL■項目テキスト406:ニューノーマルの名無しさん 20/12/10 17:49:53.17 5unefbm40.net >>401 とくにNHKは受信料を徴収しておきながら中国共産党の手下に成り下がってるゴミクズ以外 407:ニューノーマルの名無しさん 20/12/10 17:50:01.08 bwScDbB40.net いくら考えてもバイデンのよいところが見つからないわ 408:ニューノーマルの名無しさん 20/12/10 17:50:45.04 5mw87GvG0.net 日本のエリート層の大半は親中へ回帰している ネトウヨだけが現実が見えずに反中親米の憲兵隊化している 歴史なきアメリカなど軍事力でNo1から落ちれば世界の誰にも相手にされないよ 暴力で世界を抑え込んでいただけの蛮勇の国だからね 409:ニューノーマルの名無しさん 20/12/10 17:51:38.38 i0PfAM2l0.net >>397 The want of due diligence demonstrated in this matter is unmistakable. Petitioners filed this facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory provisions more than one year after the enactment of Act 77. At the time this action was filed on November 21, 2020, millions of Pennsylvania voters had already expressed their will in both the June 2020 Primary Election and the November 2020 General Election and the final ballots in the 2020 General Election were being tallied, with the results becoming seemingly apparent. Nevertheless, Petitioners waited to commence this litigation until days before the county boards of election were required to certify the election results to the Secretary of the Commonwealth. Thus, it is beyond cavil that Petitioners failed to act with due diligence in presenting the instant claim. Equally clear is the substantial prejudice arising from Petitioners’ failure to institute promptly a facial challenge to the mail-in voting statutory scheme, as such inaction would result in the disenfranchisement of millions of Pennsylvania voters. 3ページ目のこれね 次ページ最新レス表示レスジャンプ類似スレ一覧スレッドの検索話題のニュースおまかせリストオプションしおりを挟むスレッドに書込スレッドの一覧暇つぶし2ch