20/02/23 00:15:02 Yuj5yYBZ0.net
ここらへん？日本政府が二次感染させた証拠がなきゃ無理って書いてませんか？
既に横浜に着く時には拡散されていたしプリンセスもショーを続行し隔離したはずの客もルール違反ばかりしてたって
I guess the plaintiffs' bar will have to muster the evidence to prove the risk of secondary infection was unreasonable, which will include proving there were such infections and that the govt had viable alternativesj
And since I think I misconstrued your question in the first place, I'll try again.
Regarding Princess's potential liability for not taking "appropriate measures" after learning of the infected Hong Kong man who had been on board and until the time the Japanese health officials
took charge: Plaintiffs will need to prove spread of infection occurred in that window, they suffered from that spread, and it was unreasonable for Princess not to do something.
Comparative fault also an issue because passengers were informed of issue when notified of increased