21/08/14 10:12:21.26 +HkvdIk4.net
>>31 関連
そして、この場に、Vesselin Dimitrov氏が居たが、彼はScholze 氏を支持しなかった
彼は、IUT IVに関して論文を出しています。
もし、IUTがScholze 氏のいうように、論文の体を成していないならば、そのようなことは、意味が無い
だから、Vesselin Dimitrov氏は、Scholze 氏とは立ち位置が違うように思いますね
(参考)
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.math.columbia.edu)
Vesselin Dimitrov says:
April 5, 2020 at 1:37 am
All of this is confusing. Let me at least try to clarify something about effectivity and the external reduction.
@David Roberts: One can certainly be more explicit by spelling out ? if not bypassing ? what exactly those restrictive standing hypotheses mean. This paper by Dupuy and Hilado actually involves all of Mochizuki’s special assumptions (from I Def. 3.1) occurring in his already explicit claim IV 1.10, and even more: [D-H] furthermore require the elliptic curve to have a good reduction at all prime ideals of residue characteristic 2. The latter is not assumed by Mochizuki (he rather states an explicit bound on the prime-to-2 part of the minimal discriminant, under his other assumptions in I Def. 3.1); and the Belyi maps argument does not allow a reduction to the case of good reduction above 2 (it only re