20/05/14 21:00:54.77 xfdjzzyp.net
>>698
>これに関してアンチ望月にならないための反論ある？
それ 意味分かんないけど
S・Sレポ8月版 って、2018年でしょ？
そして、2020年4月3日に「査読終り。IUT成立。SSレポートはアウト」の記者会見
その後、Woitブログで、ショルツ先生 vs Dupuy先生のバトルが、下記
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.math.columbia.edu) （woitブログ）
Not Even Wrong Latest on abc Posted on April 3, 2020 by woit
より、以下抜粋
１）
Peter Scholze says:
April 17, 2020 at 7:15 pm
PS: I just realized that maybe the following information is worth sharing. Namely, as an outsider one may wonder that the questions being discussed at length in these comments (e.g., the issue of distinct copies etc.) are very far from the extremely intricate definitions in Mochizuki’s manuscripts (his notation is famously forbidding, some of it surfaced in Taylor’s comments),
and feel almost philosophical, so one might wonder that one is not looking at the heart of the matter.
However, the discussions in Kyoto went along extremely similar lines, and these discussions were actually very much led, certainly initially, by Mochizuki.
He first wanted to carefully explain the need for distinct copies, by way of perfections of rings, and then of the log-link, leading to discussions rather close to the one I was having with UF here.
He agreed that one first has to understand these basic points before it makes sense to introduce all further layers of complexity. (I should add that we did also go through the substance of the papers, but kept getting back at how this reflects on the basic points, as we all agreed that this is the key of the matter.)
要するに、いまさら、「IUTは難しいので、基本的なポイントを理解する必要がある」などという
つづく