Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 (応援スレ) 45

Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 (応援スレ) 45at MATH

Inter-universal geometry と ABC予想 (応援スレ) 45 - 暇つぶし2ch72:irst-hand opinion on Mochizuki’s work, but on comparing this story with the work of Perelman and Yitang Zhang you mentioned that I am much more familiar with, one striking difference to me has been the presence of short “proof of concept” statements in the latter but not in the former, by which I mean ways in which the methods in the papers in question can be used relatively quickly to obtain new non-trivial results of interest (or even a new proof of an existing non-trivial result) in an existing field. In the case of Perelman’s work, already by the fifth page of the first paper Perelman had a novel interpretation of Ricci flow as a gradient flow which looked very promising,・・” Venkateshは、2017年はまだフィールズ賞受賞前だし、目にとまらなかったで、かれの”I couldn’t agree more.”をどう解釈するかだが、私は「アンチには不同意」と読んだよ（否定文だし）単に、「まだ証明されてないって意見」でも、ほとんど意味同じでしょうね（アンチが多いのだから）なお、Venkateshは、IUT IVの組合わせ論にコメントして、謝辞に名前がでているが私の推理では、Venkateshはフェセンコ先生から言われて、IUT IVの組合わせ論を見たんじゃ無いかな？ Venkateshはフェセンコ先生の弟子だから、多分ね（＾＾；

次ページ

続きを表示

1を表示