20/04/24 10:55:44 +5fH8L59.net
>>309
レスありがとう
下記の Taylor Dupuy says:ですね
で、”Peter Scholze says: April 17, 2020 at 6:25 pm”で、
”You are simply ignoring my point!”
自分で言って、フェセンコ先生のセリフ「単純化しすぎ」を思い出したかな（＾＾
”Peter Scholze says: April 17, 2020 at 7:15 pm”
で、”However, the discussions in Kyoto went along extremely similar lines, and these discussions were actually very much led, certainly initially, by Mochizuki. ”
などと言っていますね（＾＾；
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.math.columbia.edu)
Not Even Wrong
Latest on abc
Posted on April 3, 2020 by woit
(抜粋)
Taylor Dupuy says:
April 17, 2020 at 12:17 pm
*****************
Regarding (2)
*****************
BUT if we are going to dispose of these things entirely as in (1) you can probably scrap a lot from section 2 of IUT2.
I need to think about how this construction works in order to say something precise.
I personally would ask Emmanuel Lepage or Jakob Stix about this.
Peter Scholze says:
April 17, 2020 at 6:25 pm
Dear Taylor,
> Well, I claim that Theorem 3.11.i and 3.11.ii are not the difficult parts of Theorem 3.11;
You are simply ignoring my point!
Best wishes!
Peter
Peter Scholze says:
April 17, 2020 at 7:15 pm
PS: I just realized that maybe the following information is worth sharing. Namely,
However, the discussions in Kyoto went along extremely similar lines, and these discussions were actually very much led, certainly initially, by Mochizuki.
He first wanted to carefully explain the need for distinct copies, by way of perfections of rings, and then of the log-link, leading to discussions rather close to the one I was having with UF here.
He agreed that one first has to understand these basic points before it makes sense to introduce all further layers of complexity.