20/04/18 09:34:37 FUrf+qJl.net
>>108
まず、文字化け訂正
Really? I would have hoped that in that case at least one of them ? not in their role as a referee, but simply as a mathematician who wants to share insight ? would have come around and explain the key ideas in a way that is understandable.
↓
Really? I would have hoped that in that case at least one of them - not in their role as a referee, but simply as a mathematician who wants to share insight - would have come around and explain the key ideas in a way that is understandable.
さて
Dupuy says
”Finally, it is not outside the realm of reality that there could be 5 top notch international referees who have understood the proof as complete and correct.”
DeepL翻訳(一部修正)
”最後に、証明を完全かつ正しいと理解している(数論)トップ5人の一流の国際審判員がいることは、現実の範囲内です。”
かな
そして、上記 Scholze氏発言(上記訂正の)”・・would have come around and explain the key ideas in a way that is understandable.”
は、「RIMSよ、説明責任を果たせ!」ってことですね
Scholze氏は、海外の数学者の多くを代表していると思います
「RIMSのやっていること、わけわからん、ごらぁ~、ちゃんと説明しろ~!」ってことです(^^;