20/04/05 10:01:07.17 cTzpxuVq.net
>>408
>ではなんでEMSから、major revisionsがないのに出版したらRIMSに悪影響だぞって釘を刺されるんだ？
>周りの状況は今回の査読陣でもまったく納得していないってことだろ。
細かくは分からない
ＥＭＳとＲＩＭＳの間の契約関係でしょ、具体的には
つまり、平たく言えば、「ＲＩＭＳがＥＭＳに頼んで、これ発行してね」という委託関係でしょ？
で、ＥＭＳが「こんなの査読になっとらん。疑問ありあり」という権限はあるのかが、問題でして
無いと思うよ、普通。査読の権限は、ＥＭＳになく ＲＩＭＳにありでしょう？ 多分。ああ、下記の通りだね
(The EMS has no editorial control over the journal's content, Mehrmann says, and he was unaware of the upcoming announcement until contacted by Nature.)
(>>336より)
URLﾘﾝｸ(www.nature.com)
naturenewsarticle
NEWS 03 APRIL 2020
UPDATE 03 APRIL 2020
Mathematical proof that rocked number theory will be published
But some experts say author Shinichi Mochizuki failed to fix fatal flaw in solution of major arithmetics problem.
Davide Castelvecchi
Additional reporting by David Cyranoski.
UPDATES & CORRECTIONS
Update 03 April 2020: This story has been updated to include comments from Kashiwara and Tamagawa at a press conference in Kyoto.
(抜粋)
If the editors of the journal “waved away these criticisms” and published the paper without major revisions, it would reflect badly on them and on Mochizuki himself, says Volker Mehrmann, the president of the European Mathematical Society (EMS), which publishes the journal on behalf of RIMS.
(The EMS has no editorial control over the journal's content, Mehrmann says, and he was unaware of the upcoming announcement until contacted by Nature.)