19/12/07 19:39:38 H2e5WMAT.net
>>336
つづき
Completion of the proof
The deduction of the Riemann hypothesis from this estimate is mostly a fairly straightforward use of standard techniques and is done as follows.
Deligne's second proof
Deligne (1980) found and proved a generalization of the Weil conjectures, bounding the weights of the pushforward of a sheaf.
In practice it is this generalization rather than the original Weil conjectures that is mostly used in applications, such as the hard Lefschetz theorem. Much of the second proof is a rearrangement of the ideas of his first proof.
The main extra idea needed is an argument closely related to the theorem of Jacques Hadamard and Charles Jean de la Vallee Poussin, used by Deligne to show that various L-series do not have zeros with real part 1.
Inspired by the work of Witten (1982) on Morse theory, Laumon (1987) found another proof, using Deligne's l-adic Fourier transform, which allowed him to simplify Deligne's proof by avoiding the use of the method of Hadamard and de la Vallee Poussin.
His proof generalizes the classical calculation of the absolute value of Gauss sums using the fact that the norm of a Fourier transform has a simple relation to the norm of the original function.
Kiehl & Weissauer (2001) used Laumon's proof as the basis for their exposition of Deligne's theorem. Katz (2001) gave a further simplification of Laumon's proof, using monodromy in the spirit of Deligne's first proof.
Kedlaya (2006) gave another proof using the Fourier transform, replacing etale cohomology with rigid cohomology.
つづく