16/10/23 17:18:04.89 MjfWcywG.net
>>565
どうも。スレ主です。
おっちゃんらしいな
最後まで、理解できそうもないのが、おっちゃんかい？
”答えが0と主張している”というのは、時枝の99/100に対してか？ もとの問題なら、０だ。>>532 game２なら1/10だよ
”高校以下”？ 前スレより下記を引用するが、mathoverflowで、2013年に議論されているよ。”高校以下”の議論じゃない。まあ、おっちゃん英語弱そうだが・・（＾＾；
24 自分：現代数学の系譜11 ガロア理論を読む[] 投稿日：2016/09/18(日) 10:30:18.26 ID:9cd3XTDs [24/51]
前スレ（現代数学の系譜11 ガロア理論を読む22）より 再録
512 自分返信：１３２人目の素数さん[] 投稿日：2016/09/10(土) 14:12:51.62 ID:q7Skbg74 [10/14]
>>511 つづき
英 mathoverflowは参考になる
URLﾘﾝｸ(mathoverflow.net)
Probabilities in a riddle involving axiom of choice - MathOverflow: edited Dec 9 '13 Denis
(抜粋)
The question is about a modification of the following riddle (you can think about it before reading the answer if you like riddles, but that's not the point of my question):
The Riddle: We assume there is an infinite sequence of boxes, numbered 0,1,2,…
. Each box contains a real number. No hypothesis is made on how the real numbers are chosen.
You are a team of 100 mathematicians, and the challenge is the following: each mathematician can open as many boxes as he wants, even infinitely many, but then he has to guess the content of a box he has not opened.
Then all boxes are closed, and the next mathematician can play. There is no communication between mathematicians after the game has started, but they can agree on a strategy beforehand.
You have to devise a strategy such that at most one mathematician fails. Axiom of choice is allowed.
（この後＜11＞でAlexander Prussによる確率分布の議論があるよ）
（抜粋おわり）